Latest Blog Entries

Conference on Constitutional History: Comparative Perspectives – Call for papers
Fri, Jun 16 (2017)

The ??SDD would like to present you the TENTATIVE SCHEDULE of SUMMER SCHOOL “EU and Legal Reform” 2017
Tue, Jun 13 (2017)

International Human Rights Class: 2017 Indigenous People’s Rights Role Play
Fri, May 5 (2017)

2017 International Law Study Trip to The Hague, Netherlands
Fri, Mar 24 (2017)

Distinguished Guest Professors visit CCSDD to discuss IACL project on Constitutionalism in Illiberal Democracies and to talk about constitutional development and human rights in Asia
Tue, Feb 14 (2017)





Center for Constitutional Studies and Democratic Development | Research | Elections in European Conditionality. Transitions and Established Democracies

EL.E.C.T.E.D. Elections in European Conditionality. Transitions and Established Democracies

Main Researcher: Dr. Sara Pennicino

ELECTED Elections in European Conditionality. Transitions and Established Democracies was a two year project which ended in 2013. See teaching activities which resulted from that project (both academic and Training) conducted by Dr. Sara Pennicino

Results While carrying out the necessary research so as to answer to ELECTED's primary research question (i.e. have constitutionally entrenched electoral watchdog bodies become a condition to enter the Union?) the issue of what system established democracies have opted for to manage and control elections progressively gained importance. More specifically, while defining the content of EU conditionality, the fact that founding members of the Union did not match the standards set for candidate States became crucial to the original objectives of ELECTED. Art. 66 of the Italian Constitution, for example, provides for electoral controversies to be addressed exclusively by Parliament itself. The latter principle responds to the necessity of protecting Parliament's independence from the other branches of government and is coherent with the traditional separation of powers. However, not only this system has proved to be problematic, as for example in the case of the vote on MPs' disqualification (Silvio Berlusconi), but it is also incompatible with standards requirements imposed to countries that are candidates to enter the EU.

As a consequence, efforts have been devoted to argue in domestic Law Reviews and public fora in favour of a Constitutional reform of Art. 66 of the Italian Constitution:

  • The Creation of an Independent Electoral Commission as a Complement to the Reform of the Italian Electoral Law, in E. Catelani, F. Donati, M.C. Grisolia (eds.), Electoral Justice, ESI, Napoli, 2013 (with F. Biagi) [in Italian].

  • A proposal to amend Art. 66 of the Italian Constitution. The Creation of an Independent Electoral Commission, in Percorsi costituzionali, no. 1/2, 2012, with F. Biagi [in Italian].

  • Regional electoral controversies also have to be addessed:
  • The Unbearable Lightness of Regional Electoral Claims with regard to the 2010 Italian Regional Elections, in Istituzioni del federalismo, no. 2/3, 2013.

As a result, thanks to the support of the George Lawrence Abernethy Endowment, the CCSDD has become a leading voice in the debate regarding the amendment of Art. 66 of the Italian Constitution (see also the proposal of Constitutional reform drafted by the committee appointed by the President of the Republic).


Location:

CCSDD
via San Giacomo 9/2
40126 Bologna
Italy
051/0453275
Mailing Address:

CCSDD
c/o Johns Hopkins University
via Belmeloro 11
40126 Bologna
Italy

Email


Copyright © 2017. All Rights Reserved.